Although some historians have
documented environmental norms issued in the nineteenth century (and even much
earlier), it was in the second half of the twentieth century that the need to
manage the relationship of humanity with the biosphere, in response to the
growing environmental problems that were already beginning to manifest with
intensity.
Since that time much has been
proposed about the conservation of ecosystems: international agreements have
been signed, legislation has been tightened, a wide variety of management tools
have been designed focused on this topic, environmental awareness has been
incorporated in educational institutions, environmental protection
organizations have been created, among others. However, the doubts and myths
that have arisen on Environmental Consultants of Sydney have also been enough.
In particular, one aspect that
has been emphasized in the last years is the one that corresponds to the
responsibility that concerns the private sector in the affectation of the
environment. Undoubtedly, companies (as apparent users of ecosystem services)
have a direct impact on the state of the situation.
Signs of this are the resounding
cases in which the execution of some productive projects precisely and to a
great extent affects the quality of air, water, soil and health of a community
(hydrocarbon spills, emissions toxic gases, pollution of water sources, among
others).
Due to the above, it has been
highlighted the need for companies to incorporate into their activities what is
known as Corporate Environmental Management. That is, to adopt measures that
prevent, mitigate, correct and compensate for the possible negative impacts
that the productive processes carried out by the company (and the products
themselves) cause to the socio-ecological system.
1. The responsibility of implementing Corporate Environmental
Management is only applicable for large companies
It is a common perception to
think that just large corporations have a significant impact on the
environment. It is believed that due to the vast scope of its activities, the
enormous amount of resources used, the large volumes of waste generated and
even its appreciable financial capacity, only these types of companies cause
relevant adverse effects and therefore are those that must implement measures
of environmental management in the operation of the business.
2. Corporate Environmental Management is an economically costly burden
for companies
Although the levels of
environmental awareness have increased, it is still common to find suspicion
about the implementation of environmental management in entrepreneurs. There
are those who assert that it is an economic burden that they cannot sustain.
Nevertheless, the environmental consulting
in Sydney has
demonstrated on numerous occasions that in fact do not suppose an expense but
turns out to be a profitable investment.
3. Environmental requirements are a limitation to economic development
Perhaps the most disturbing myth
for economic actors is that environmental standards are an obstacle or a
constraint to economic growth. It has a dichotomous thinking that if it is
intended to promote the development of a territory cannot conserve its
ecosystem, and if you try to retain the ecosystem is impossible to promote
growth.
But the Environmental Management
Business has not been an exception as far as the generation of myths is
treated. The following are the most common:
